Actually, the proposal was NOT to make two ways to tag Cantonese. That was Mark's addendum today. Addison Addison Phillips Globalization Architect -- Lab126 Internationalization is not a feature. It is an architecture. > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Duerst [mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp] > Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 6:21 PM > To: Phillips, Addison; LTRU Working Group > Subject: Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal... > > At 17:31 08/06/02, Martin Duerst wrote: > >[co-chair hat on] > > Still on. > > >On the other hand, I don't remember seeing anybody actively > >opposing to this proposal, which is definitely a good sign. > >If you have support/comments, or a somewhat different proposal > >for a compromize, don't hesitate to send it to the list. > > Actually, this was inaccurate, Karen expressed her concerns. > Karen, could you be more explicit about where this proposal > makes your guidance task worse? Is the main problem with > the fact that there would be two allowed ways to tag e.g. > Cantonese, one of them deprecated? Or is the main problem > that there would be only extlangs for Chinese and Arabic, > but not for some other languages (e.g. Malay)? Or anything > else? > > Regards, Martin. > > > > #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University > #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp > mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.