"Phillips, Addison" <addison at amazon dot com> wrote: > I mean, after all, we have subtags like 'AQ' that don't provide a lot > of meaning. Why not one variant? "tlh-gaulish" is probably more useful > than "tlh-AQ"... :-D 'AQ' isn't something we (or ietf-languages) registered either individually or as part of a small, specially admitted group (like 'EU'). It's officially assigned in ISO 3166-1 and was added to the Registry as part of a philosophy that did not involve cherry-picking. -- Doug Ewell * Arvada, Colorado, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14 http://www.ewellic.org http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages ˆ _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.