Doug Ewell wrote: > I've just posted an editor's copy of > draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06. Follow > the links from here to find your favorite version for reviewing: > > http://www.ewellic.org/rfc4645bis.html > > The draft-06 links are on the right. > > There are a lot of changes from draft-05 here (extlangs, ISO 639-5, > Scope field), so please take a look at this and make comments. 1) File production issue: There is some garbage text at the end of http://www.ewellic.org/lstreg-4646bis-draft-06.txt. 2) Not an LTRU issue, but 639-2 has the approach of having the word "languages" (or "other") in the descriptions for collection codes. However, the following two collection codes do not have the word "languages" (nor "other") in their descriptions: Subtag:bh Description:Bihari Added:2005-10-16 Scope:collection Subtag:him Description:Himachali Added:2005-10-16 Scope:collection /kent k _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.