At 18:03 08/06/20, Kent Karlsson wrote: >I see that as implying that there is an implicit "as used in the US" >part of the description of "sgn-US", even though that is not part >of the description for "sgn-US" in the registry. (Etc. for the other >sgn-* grandfathered tags.) It's indeed "sign language as used in the US", but in a wider sense, not in a narrower sense. Even for en-US, there is a lot of it that wasn't created in the US itself. Regards, Martin. #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.