[co-chair hat on] I have seen various people express their support for mapping sgn-us to ase, and as far as I understand, it seems Kent is the only one supporting the mapping of sgn-us to ase-us. Unless anybody has any new information or changes his/her opinion, I would like to close this issue, so that we can concentrate discussion on where we still need it. Regards, Martin. At 03:58 08/06/27, Kent Karlsson wrote: >Doug Ewell wrote: >> "Phillips, Addison" <addison at amazon.com> wrote: >> >> > The subtag 'ase' will replace "sgn-US" as the (sub)tag meaning >> > "American Sign Language". You can then use region subtags with it as >> > needed. E.g. ase-US or sgn-ase-US (based on the current draft). Among >> > other things, it means that we don't need to do anything except >> > deprecate the grandfathered tag "sgn-US" (etc.) >> >> Which, I hasten to add, draft-4645bis already does, not only in the >> replacement Registry contents but also in Section 2.5 of the prose. > >I still say that it is not even a possible interpretation of RFC 3066 >to remove the region code in these cases, no matter how the sgn-* tags >were discussed at registration time. > >The "US" part in "sgn-US" is and remains a region code, and the >appropriate target code (for Preferred-Value of the to-be-deprecated >tag sgn-US) should be "asl-US". "asl-CA" (e.g.) is simply not covered >with tags in the current LSR, along with 100+ other sign languages >(plus regional variants of those sign languages) that will be taggable >using 639-3 codes. > > /kent k > >_______________________________________________ >Ltru mailing list >Ltru at ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.