[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] A radical proposal (was: Re: extlang & deprecation)



 
Doug Ewell wrote:
> 2.  Define all of the Y forms (e.g. "cmn") in the Registry as Type: 
> extlang, none as Type: language.  Bear with me here.
> 
> 3.  Change the prose (and ABNF if necessary) to specify that an 
> "extlang" can be used either alone, as "cmn" (Y), or together with its 
> Prefix, as "zh-cmn" (X-Y).  In other words, an "extlang" is a special 
> type of "language" that has an optional Prefix. [...]

I don't think the -16 ABNF needs to be changed at all for that,
just the prose.

	/kent k

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru



Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.