Shawn Steele <Shawn dot Steele at microsoft dot com> wrote:
Re: Deprecated.I happen to work for a large company that regularly gets "beat up" in the media for not using the preferred forms of standards. Those doing the ranting usually don't care if there is a "good reason" or not for using the non-preferred form. They also aren't going to bother with minor details like reading the definition of a well-known term like "deprecated".
This is the point I was trying to make about our terminology, but maybe Shawn's real-world perspective will help lend it some more serious consideration.
-- Doug Ewell * Arvada, Colorado, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14 http://www.ewellic.org http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages ˆ _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.