[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] 2.2.6: extensions within overall tag syntax

From: "Broome, Karen" <Karen_Broome at spe.sony.com>
To: Peter Constable <petercon at microsoft.com>, LTRU Working Group <ltru at ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 15:42:58 -0700
In-reply-to: <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB835795633901FE95 at NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB835795633901FE95 at NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

I support this clarification based on the misinterpretations I've seen of this text in the wild.

Karen

________________________________________
From: ltru-bounces at ietf.org [ltru-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Peter Constable [petercon at microsoft.com]

References:
- [Ltru] 2.2.6: extensions within overall tag syntax
  - From: Peter Constable

Prev by Date: Re: [Ltru] 2.2.4: codes listed as eligible for registration in 4645
Next by Date: Re: [Ltru] 2.1: casing
Previous by thread: Re: [Ltru] 2.2.6: extensions within overall tag syntax
Next by thread: [Ltru] 2.2.8: typo
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.