Re: [Ltru] 3.1.2: extended language range not defined

["Phillips, Addison" <addison at amazon.com>]

(editor hat)

I inserted various references to RFC 4647. Note that I also spelled out "extended language range" in quotes in most of these cases (to make clear that we are referencing a specific term). I also tightened the text in 3.1.6 along the lines the Peter requested.

Addison

Addison Phillips
Globalization Architect -- Lab126

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ltru-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces at ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Peter Constable
> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 9:40 PM
> To: LTRU Working Group
> Subject: Re: [Ltru] 3.1.2: extended language range not defined
>
> Btw, "language range" or "extended language range" are also used in
> Sections 3.1.6, 3.1.7 and 4.1.
>
> Peter
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ltru-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces at ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of
> > Peter Constable
> > Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 8:41 PM
> > To: LTRU Working Group
> > Subject: [Ltru] 3.1.2: extended language range not defined
> >
> > In draft 16, there's a reference in Section 3.1.2 in the part on
> the
> > Preferred-Value field to "extended language range". That term is
> not
> > defined in the draft for 4646bis, however. Either a definition
> should
> > be given in this doc, or a reference provided to another doc in
> which
> > it is defined.
> >
> >
> > Peter
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ltru mailing list
> > Ltru at ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru