(editor hat) I mentioned the tightening in my previous message. Here is Peter's request: > The current draft has this text in Section 3.1.6: > > ------------- > The 'Preferred-Value' field in subtag records of type "extlang" use > the same format as grandfathered or redundant tags. This allows the > subtag to be deprecated in favor of either a single primary > language subtag or a new language-extlang sequence. > ------------- > > It's not clear to me what's meant: in just what way is the format > the same as for grandfathered or redundant tags? The requirements > stated in 3.1.1 that apply to *all* fields would be one similarity, > but obviously that's not what was in mind. Is it that the field > "contains language ranges that are strongly RECOMMENDED for use in > place of the record's value"? It's just not clear, but should be. > ... this text now reads... <t>The 'Preferred-Value' field in subtag records of type "extlang" also contains an "extended language range". This allows the subtag to be deprecated in favor of either a single primary language subtag or a new language-extlang sequence.</t> _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.