Phillips, Addison scripsit: > In Section 3.4 (iana stability) we have rules for transitioning > grandfathered tags to redundant. Recently there was a thread on the list > suggesting that the remaining regular grandfathered list is basically > closed and cannot become redundant because of various other rules we > have in place. Should we modify the text to say this? (It would be > nice to get rid of extraneous rules for a change). +1 > As I believe John Cowan pointed out, only 'lojban', 'gaulish', > 'guoyu', 'hakka', and 'xiang' could ever become variants. Of these, > only 'gaulish' has some semblance of residual meaning as a variant > (and this one not much). The others are, without exception, deprecated > in favor of something else. cel-gaulish would be semantically anomalous anyhow: a language collection followed by a language variant, with no actual *language*. I say it's a dead duck. -- In my last lifetime, John Cowan I believed in reincarnation; http://www.ccil.org/~cowan in this lifetime, cowan at ccil.org I don't. --Thiagi _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.