Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants

[Peter Constable <petercon at microsoft.com>]

I'm sure we've discussed this at some point in the past...


Peter

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ltru-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Martin Hosken
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 12:02 AM
> To: ltru at ietf.org
> Subject: [Ltru] Canonical variants
>
> Dear All,
>
> I may have missed something in my reading but strong things are written
> about extension authorities having to provide canonicalizations for
> their subvariants, but I can find no canonicalization criteria for
> registered variants.
>
> e.g. is it en-boont-fonipa, en-fonipa-boont, en-Latn-boont-fonipa, en-
> Latn-fonipa-boont
>
> Yours,
> Martin Hosken
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru