[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants



Dear John,

> > I may have missed something in my reading but strong things are written
> > about extension authorities having to provide canonicalizations for
> > their subvariants, but I can find no canonicalization criteria for
> > registered variants.
> 
> You are confusing variants with extensions.

In what way? If we consider variants to be elements of an unmarked extension, then just as an extension must provide a canonical order for its elements, so should we for the variants. Otherwise what is the relative canonical order for two variants?

Yours,
Martin
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru



Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.