Hi, I agree with getting this done. Soon. I wish the co-chairs would help us resolve the big consensus issues ahead of a last call, if possible. We've had proposals galore. We need to achieve some closure on the approach and handling of extlangs in particular. In practical terms, I will finish incorporating comments from the list as quickly as possible and complete a full review/edit of my own in order to submit draft-17 shortly (i.e. today or tomorrow). Following this, we should be able to close out any remaining issues. Addison Addison Phillips Globalization Architect -- Lab126 Internationalization is not a feature. It is an architecture. > -----Original Message----- > From: ltru-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces at ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Peter Constable > Sent: Friday, July 11, 2008 7:07 AM > To: Martin Duerst; LTRU Working Group > Subject: Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants > > +1 > > I submitted a bunch of mostly-editorial comments this week, > although there were a couple of technical discussions that resulted > (descriptions, canonicalization). I hadn't read through a draft in > a long while, and I did that now because I wanted to get a handle > on which parts of the document are at issue in resolving the open > issues around extlang, canonicalization, deprecation and preferred- > value. I see that as the last key issue, as far as I recall, and > I'd like to see us settle that and wrap up. This month. There will > always be things that could be improved, but we need to accept that > 4646bis will not be perfect and get it out so that people can start > using it. However we resolve that last key issue, it will be good > enough to be usable -- maybe a little awkward for some of us at > times, but still workable. > > Let's get this done. This month. > > I'm hoping Addison will have draft 17 complete over the weekend > with revisions from this week's comments incorporated, and that we > can close those issues and work through the last elephant next week. > > > Peter > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ltru-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces at ietf.org] On > Behalf Of > > Martin Duerst > > Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 10:12 PM > > To: Phillips, Addison; Doug Ewell; LTRU Working Group > > Subject: Re: [Ltru] Canonical variants > > > > >> On Behalf Of Doug Ewell > > >> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 9:40 PM > > > > >> But as I said, we are really stretching the limits of brass > handle > > >> polishing at this point. > > > > [chair hat on] > > I agree that we should try to concentrate on our main issues. > > Reading our charter at > > http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html, > > > > I see for example the following: > > The working group will clarify text where necessary. It may also > > make adjustments to the registration process and the form of the > > registry if this is deemed appropriate based on ongoing > registration > > and operational experience. These adjustments and clarifications > > are not expected to delay the progress of the work. > > > > Please note in particular "not expected to delay" and > > "based on ongoing registration and operational experience". > > > > I suggest that if further operational experience after RFC > 4646bis > > shows that further tweaks may be needed, somebody can then > propose > > the creation of a new LTRU WG. > > > > Regards, Martin. > > > > >> Look at the scenario we have to dream up > > >> for > > >> this to be a problem: two or more prefixless variants in a > single > > >> tag, > > >> where the meanings of the two variants interact in such a way > that > > >> order > > >> is important, AND we need to make sure a search engine or > other > > >> matching > > >> engine can match this tag properly when taking BOTH prefixless > > >> variants > > >> into account. It's almost like we're trying to make work for > > >> ourselves. > > > > > > > > #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin > University > > #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp > > mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Ltru mailing list > > Ltru at ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru > > _______________________________________________ > Ltru mailing list > Ltru at ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.