[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] editor copy updated...



Phillips, Addison scripsit:

> I have updated the editor's copy of draft-17 on inter-locale just now,
> including the various edits just posted on this list.

Just a few editorial nits:

Section 3.4, bullet point 17:  s/did so/became so/; becoming is not a
species of doing (in technical language "become" is an unaccusative verb).

3.5, paragraph beginning "Requests to add a 'Prefix' field to a variant
subtag", add to end:

        Variant subtags based on the terminology of the language to
        which they apply are encouraged.

Or put this somewhere else.

4.1 bullet point 2: s/this field by defines/this field defines/.

4.1 bullet point 6:

        If a variant lists another variant in one of its 'Prefix' fields,
        it SHOULD appear directly after that variant in any language
        tag where both occur.

is confusing; rewrite as:

        If a variant lists a second variant in one of its 'Prefix' fields,
        the first variant SHOULD appear directly after the second variant
        in any language tag where both occur.

4.1.1: s/Each Macrolanguage/Each macrolanguage/.

5: s/steps to reasonably ascertain/reasonable steps to ascertain/.

-- 
Dream projects long deferred             John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org>
usually bite the wax tadpole.            http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
        --James Lileks
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru



Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.