[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Changes to draft-4645bis resulting from new draft-4646bis



Mark Davis wrote:

Maybe we should go the other direction and inherit from Macrolanguage.

No. We should impose all and only those conditions that are required. And the required condition is that "zh-yue" and "yue", being equivalent, need to have the same SS. If we make the SS of the corresponding primary language subtag apply to the entlang, then we don't have the possibility of mismatches in the repository. But I send you possible language if you (and others) really want it in there.

I think we should be very grateful at this point that 'zh' does not have a Suppress-Script.

--
Doug Ewell  *  Thornton, Colorado, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://www.ewellic.org
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages  ˆ

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.