Leif Halvard Silli scripsit: > For instance, the current registration of "1996" does not specify that > it is a "de-DE" related norm. As if "de-CH-1996" would also be correct. It would be. The 1996 reforms were adopted for de-DE, de-AT, de-LI, and in modified form (no �) for de-CH. -- John Cowan http://ccil.org/~cowan cowan at ccil.org 'Tis the Linux rebellion / Let coders take their place, The Linux-nationale / Shall Microsoft outpace, We can write better programs / Our CPUs won't stall, So raise the penguin banner of / The Linux-nationale. --Greg Baker _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.