|
I do want to remind you all of
the opinion expressed that it would not be a good idea to include numbers in a
code. AP> Yes. It was an opinion
and I think it was wrong. Besides, we already have some year variants and we
have UN M.49 codes, which are numbers. So this means that codes like
2006g would not be acceptable. If this is indeed the case, I am interested to
learn what code would be acceptable. From a technical perspective the code
"qwerty" would function as well... Again, I prefer not to read any
meaning in a code. Why would ‘2006g’ be
unacceptable? It is valid. It might not be the best or most mnemonic choice,
but there is nothing wrong with it. Addison |
_______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.