+1 -----Original Message----- From: ltru-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Randy Presuhn Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 10:37 AM To: LTRU Working Group Subject: Re: [Ltru] Uniqueness of variant subtags Hi - As a technical contributor... I'm deeply concerned that this thread is leading to a seriously over-specified, over-engineered solution. There are several different concerns that folks appear to be trying to address, and I'm afraid that the net effect of the proposals might be worse than the envisioned problems. (1) making "institution" mnemonics part of the formal structure logically leads to the conclusion that there should be a registry of institutions. I really don't want to go there! (2) the "same meaning" vs "same semantics" debate gets to the heart of why I so strongly opposed using the same variant tag for the Hanyu Pinyin orthography of Mandarin and a pinyin-like way of writing Tibetan. Our job is to define procedures to keep the registry running smoothly so that language tagging needs can be met. How does each interpretation effect the operation of the review process and registry? How would each impact the developer communities of products that employ language tags? Would either approach make any difference to the people using those languages? (3) With respect to the "year" business, at some point we have to stop gilding this lily with more and more advice and recognize that as more and more variant subtags are registered, it will become increasingly likely that the character string used for the variant will end up having little or no mnemonic value. Tough. It's unrealistic at this late stage in the process to come up with an architecture for the construction of variant subtags. Doing so will only increases the amount of time spent arguing about the "right" string to use for a particular variant. THEY ARE JUST SUBTAGS, and we should *NOT* do anything to foster the perception that they are anything more. Randy _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.