I thought it had already been established that:1. our terminology is largely consistent with UNGEGN (except that we don't classify certain types of scripts as "defective"), so we have no changes to make there, and
2. neither LTRU nor ietf-languages is responsible for either the French-language title of ISO 639 nor the decision to include sign languages in the scope of that standard (though we agree with that decision), so we have no changes to make there either.
-- Doug Ewell * Thornton, Colorado, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14 http://www.ewellic.org http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages ˆ _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.