[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Comments on RFC4646bis



> 
> Just a couple of editorial comments:
> 
> 1. I felt like sections 4.1.1 and 4.1.2 ought to be in reverse
> order.

(editor hat OFF)

The order is somewhat arbitrary.

> 
> 2. I'm cringing at the text in section 4.2 " a tag such as <meta
> http-equiv="Content-Language" value="de" />" since it will probably
> encourage people to think that this is how to declare language in
> HTML, whereas it is currently not widely interoperable and confuses
> people wrt attributes in html tag.  Why not change the example to
> say " For example, in the same HTML document described in the
> preceding bullet, sending an HTTP header containing Content-
> Language: de might be a way to indicate..."

<meta> is one way to indicate the intended audience. Nonetheless, I like your version better, since there is a lively discussion about what <meta> means or should mean and cetera.

(editor hat ON)

Unless anyone objects, I will update the editor's copy to include Richard's version of the text for 4.2. 

Addison


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru



Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.