At 04:40 08/10/10, Phillips, Addison answered Richard Ishida: >> 2. I'm cringing at the text in section 4.2 " a tag such as <meta >> http-equiv="Content-Language" value="de" />" since it will probably >> encourage people to think that this is how to declare language in >> HTML, whereas it is currently not widely interoperable and confuses >> people wrt attributes in html tag. Why not change the example to >> say " For example, in the same HTML document described in the >> preceding bullet, sending an HTTP header containing Content- >> Language: de might be a way to indicate..." > ><meta> is one way to indicate the intended audience. Nonetheless, I like >your version better, since there is a lively discussion about what <meta> >means or should mean and cetera. > >(editor hat ON) > >Unless anyone objects, I will update the editor's copy to include Richard's >version of the text for 4.2. [technical contributor hat on] I support this change, in particular also because there is actually no 'value' attriFrom ltru-bounces at ietf.org Fri Oct 10 00:44:13 2008 Return-Path: <ltru-bounces at ietf.org> X-Original-To: ltru-archive at megatron.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-ltru-archive at core3.amsl.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0092528C0FC; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:44:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: ltru at core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: ltru at core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B5D93A682B for <ltru at core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:44:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.239 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.239 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.271, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, J_CHICKENPOX_23=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iLv8+B6eVHJr for <ltru at core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:44:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scmailgw2.scop.aoyama.ac.jp (scmailgw2.scop.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.251.195]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D56A3A63D3 for <ltru at ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:44:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scmse3.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.253.23]) by scmailgw2.scop.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id m9A7iLja024357 for <ltru at ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:44:21 +0900 (JST) Received: from (unknown [133.2.206.133]) by scmse3.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp with smtp id 317c_402950fe_969f_11dd_8c34_001d0969ab06; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:44:21 +0900 Received: from Tanzawa.it.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.210.1]:43861) by itmail.it.aoyama.ac.jp with [XMail 1.22 ESMTP Server] id <S52DBCA> for <ltru at ietf.org> from <duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp>; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:37:07 +0900 Message-Id: <6.0.0.20.2.20081010164157.092c6c58 at localhost> X-Sender: duerst at localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6J Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:43:44 +0900 To: "Phillips, Addison" <addison at amazon.com>, Richard Ishida <ishida at w3.org>, "'LTRU Working Group'" <ltru at ietf.org> From: Martin Duerst <duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <4D25F22093241741BC1D0EEBC2DBB1DA014ED50A38 at EX-SEA5-D.ant.a mazon.com> References: <00e301c92a45$abc9aa00$035cfe00$ at org> <4D25F22093241741BC1D0EEBC2DBB1DA014ED50A38 at EX-SEA5-D.ant.amazon.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Ltru] Comments on RFC4646bis X-BeenThere: ltru at ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request at ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru> List-Post: <mailto:ltru at ietf.org> List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request at ietf.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request at ietf.org?subject=subscribe> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: ltru-bounces at ietf.org Errors-To: ltru-bounces at ietf.org At 04:40 08/10/10, Phillips, Addison answered Richard Ishida: >> 2. I'm cringing at the text in section 4.2 " a tag such as <meta >> http-equiv="Content-Language" value="de" />" since it will probably >> encourage people to think that this is how to declare language in >> HTML, whereas it is currently not widely interoperable and confuses >> people wrt attributes in html tag. Why not change the example to >> say " For example, in the same HTML document described in the >> preceding bullet, sending an HTTP header containing Content- >> Language: de might be a way to indicate..." > ><meta> is one way to indicate the intended audience. Nonetheless, I like >your version better, since there is a lively discussion about what <meta> >means or should mean and cetera. > >(editor hat ON) > >Unless anyone objects, I will update the editor's copy to include Richard's >version of the text for 4.2. [technical contributor hat on] I support this change, in particular also because there is actually no 'value' attribute on bute on the <meta> element in HTML (see http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/global.html#edef-META). [chair hat on] If you disagree with this late but minor change, please speek up soon. Regards, Martin. #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru the <meta> element in HTML (see http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/global.html#edef-META). [chair hat on] If you disagree with this late but minor change, please speek up soon. Regards, Martin. #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.