Martin Duerst さんは書きました: > Hello Felix, > > At 23:26 08/10/10, Felix Sasaki wrote: > >> draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17 says in sec. 3.1.3: >> > > In that case, please change the subject, and submit issues on > different documents in different mails. Thanks. > You are right, sorry for not doing that in the first place. > > >> "Deprecated's field-body contains the date the record was deprecated. In some cases this value is before that of the associated 'Added' field in the registry." >> >> Although this thread is for the last call of 4645bis, I am wondering about the reason for the statement. "In some cases this value is before that of the associated 'Added' field in the registry.", since the ording of fields in 4645bis is not required. >> > > I have to agree this can be improved. From your quoting, it isn't exactly > clear, but it seems that you are proposing to add ", since the ording of fields in 4645bis is not required." to this sentence. I would propose > to change this to ", since there is no prescribed ording of the fields > in a record." > sounds good to me. > I also have to say that "Deprecated's" feels really ugly. > What about changing this to: > > The field-body of a Deprecated field contains the date... > Also fine by me. Felix > Regards, Martin. > > >> I created (yet another) XML version of the registry, see >> http://www.w3.org/2008/05/lta/02/lsr.xml >> And a schema for its validation >> http://www.w3.org/2008/05/lta/02/lsr.xsd >> Which checks various MUSTS from sec. 3.1 of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17 against the 4645bis draft. I did not find any errors. I also read the text of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-17 and did not find any issues. >> >> Felix >> >> Martin Duerst さんは書きました: >> >>> At 22:15 08/10/03, Doug Ewell wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I request that the co-chairs declare a Last Call on draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06. >>>> >>> As requested by Doug, I herewith declare a WG Last Call on >>> draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-06.txt. In my recollection, this is >>> the first WG Last Call on this document, and in accordance >>> with IETF practice, it will therefore last for 2 weeks. >>> The deadline for comments is Sunday, October 26, 24:00 Hawai'ian >>> time. >>> >>> Everybody please read the document and send in comments, >>> saying that it is okay as is or telling us what you think >>> needs to be changed. Please note that while the document >>> is extremely long, the textual parts are rather short, >>> and comments only on the textual parts are also very welcome >>> (of course, checking the data, either by machine or manually, >>> is also very much appreciated). >>> >>> Regards, Martin. >>> >>> >>> >>> #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University >>> #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ltru mailing list >>> Ltru at ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru >>> >>> >> > > > #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University > #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp > > _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.