Martin Duerst <duerst at it dot aoyama dot ac dot jp> wrote:
Can I please ask you to come up with some revised wording for this point? If it's indeed the dates themselves that can be inverted, this really should be made clear.
If the word "before" really is unclear in this context, then John Cowan's suggestion of "earlier than" should be fine.
--
Doug Ewell * Thornton, Colorado, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14
http://www.ewellic.org
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages ˆ
* Deprecated's field-body contains the date the record was
deprecated. In some cases this value is before that of the
associated 'Added' field in the registry.
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.