[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Confirmation question about registry fields

From: John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org>
To: "Phillips, Addison" <addison at amazon.com>
Cc: LTRU Working Group <ltru at ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:28:13 -0400
In-reply-to: <4D25F22093241741BC1D0EEBC2DBB1DA014F25AF65 at EX-SEA5-D.ant.amazon.com>
References: <48F6DF67.8030401 at w3.org> <20081016064058.GA11349 at nic.fr> <4D25F22093241741BC1D0EEBC2DBB1DA014F25AF65 at EX-SEA5-D.ant.amazon.com>

Phillips, Addison scripsit:

> - Macrolanguage
> 
> By definition, a language cannot be encompassed by more than one
> language in ISO 639-3.

Is that really 100% clear from the text of 693-3?

-- 
                Si hoc legere scis, nimium eruditionis habes.
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Ltru] Confirmation question about registry fields
  - From: Peter Constable

References:
- [Ltru] Confirmation question about registry fields
  - From: Felix Sasaki
- Re: [Ltru] Confirmation question about registry fields
  - From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [Ltru] Confirmation question about registry fields
  - From: Phillips, Addison

Prev by Date: Re: [Ltru] Confirmation question about registry fields
Next by Date: Re: [Ltru] Confirmation question about registry fields
Previous by thread: Re: [Ltru] Confirmation question about registry fields
Next by thread: Re: [Ltru] Confirmation question about registry fields
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.