|
Addison; Are we taking substantial editorial corrections yet? Or are we waiting for the copyright work around? If we are taking substantial changes, I have one (I also have a few glaring typos): http://www.inter-locale.com/ID/draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21.txt 4.1.1 par 5, last sentence { ORIGINAL TEXT } "For example, Romanian ('ro') and Moldavian ('mo') do not share a macrolanguage, but are far more closely related to each other than Cantonese ('yue') and Wu ('wuu') , which do share a macrolanguage." {! COMMENT: the [ro] [mo] example is a bit of a problem as one of the subtags has now been deprecated; 'pes' and 'prs', Eastern (Dari) and Western Farsi, would be better examples I think} Thanks. --C. E. Whitehead cewcathar at hotmail.com |
_______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.