[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bis i-d

From: "Doug Ewell" <doug at ewellic.org>
To: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 21:29:03 -0700
References: <mailman.301.1233965508.4924.ltru at ietf.org>

Randy Presuhn <randy underscore presuhn at mindspring dot com> madenumerous comments, some positive and some negative, about CE Whitehead'sproposed editorial changes.

I thought Randy had just gotten done saying that the time for editorialchanges had passed.


--
Doug Ewell  *  Thornton, Colorado, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://www.ewellic.org
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages  ˆ

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bisi-d
  - From: Randy Presuhn

Prev by Date: Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?
Next by Date: Re: [Ltru] Preferred-Value for YU?
Previous by thread: [Ltru] Fw: Last Call for Comments: Proposed work-around to the Pre-5378 Problem
Next by thread: Re: [Ltru] Edith Whitehead's proposed editorial changes to 4646bisi-d
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.