Hello Addison, At 04:48 09/02/08, Phillips, Addison wrote: >Hi Randy, > >(as co-editor) > >Thanks for this update. I'm looking forward to the 5378 issue resolving >itself and am prepared to submit a new I-D with the proper IPR mumbles and >incantations. Yes, that's exactly what's planned. >That I-D will contain the text currently in the editor-copy >of draft-21 as hosted on inter-locale, which does not currently include >*any* new edits, including my recent proposal or any of the Edith Whitehead >proposals. The editors will, of course, modify this I-D if the co-chairs >determine a consensus exists to do so. >I would like to request that the co-chairs use the issue tracker from now >to track proposed changes to the document and the dispositions thereof. I >don't want to miss anything in the limited number of new I-Ds that we'll >prepare and would like to have clear go/no-go decisions on what to incorporate. Which issue tracker? I'll gladly use a home-made Web page the same way as I did for RFC 4647, but unless it has been made significantly more usable (by my standard, which may be arbitrary), I don't plan to use the IETF tracker. Regards, Martin. #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.