[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Issue 20: 3.1.7 consequence 2119 language (Was Preferred-Value for YU)

From: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>
To: <ltru at ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:54:18 -0800
References: <BLU109-W53FAC6BEAF23583446051BB3BB0 at phx.gbl>

Hi -

> From: "CE Whitehead" <cewcathar at hotmail.com>
> To: <ltru at ietf.org>
> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 7:50 AM
> Subject: Re: [Ltru] Issue 20: 3.1.7 consequence 2119 language (Was Preferred-Value for YU)
>
> Hi, I like Mark's solution.  Does changing "MAY" to "can"
> and "will" to "MUST" consitute a normative change?
> Or just an editorial change?
...

In this case I can't imagine how the change makes any
normative difference whatsoever.

Randy

References:
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 20: 3.1.7 consequence 2119 language (Was Preferred-Value for YU)
  - From: CE Whitehead

Prev by Date: Re: [Ltru] Issue 20: 3.1.7 consequence 2119 language (Was Preferred-Value for YU)
Next by Date: Re: [Ltru] Issue #1: change ref from 2434 to 5226
Previous by thread: Re: [Ltru] Issue 20: 3.1.7 consequence 2119 language (Was Preferred-Value for YU)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.