Re: [Ltru] Issue #22: revert preferred-value for CS

[Kent Karlsson <kent.karlsson14 at comhem.se>]

I would prefer not to revert this particular change (and I guess you mean
"preferred-value for YU"). Doing so would go against the principle of
shortcutting preferred-value chains, with the idea that a preferred value
should always be a non-deprecated value. The added comment (for YU) is fine
as it is in draft 9, and better than in this case a misleading
Preferred-value.

    /kent k


Den 2009-02-13 10.21, skrev "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>:

> Hi -
> 
>> From: "Doug Ewell" <doug at ewellic.org>
>> To: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 9:05 PM
>> Subject: [Ltru] Another draft-4645bis needed
> ...
>> (2) I had already made the change to region subtag YU to remove the
>> Preferred-Value of CS and add John Cowan's comment, before Randy started
>> using the issue tracker and making decisions.  Randy says this is a
>> matter for ietf-languages and not this list.  Since 4646 doesn't permit
>> Preferred-Values to be changed, I suppose it will just have to wait
>> until 4646bis and the new Registry are published, and then be proposed
>> on ietf-languages.  In the meantime, I need to revert these changes in
>> draft-4645bis.
> ...
> 
> I've added this as issue #22.
> 
> Randy
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru