Re: [Ltru] Issue #22: revert preferred-value for CS

[Mark Davis <mark at macchiato.com>]

I view this as part of the transition to the new version, which resolves recursive preference relationships.

Mark

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 22:17, Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com> wrote:

> I would prefer not to revert this particular change (and I guess you mean
> "preferred-value for YU"). Doing so would go against the principle of
> shortcutting preferred-value chains, with the idea that a preferred value
> should always be a non-deprecated value. The added comment (for YU) is fine
> as it is in draft 9, and better than in this case a misleading
> Preferred-value.