[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Ltru] issue #3 resolution



I inserted the text in the ticket into my editor's copy. I did include the phrase "for historical purposes".

Addison

Addison Phillips
Globalization Architect -- Lab126

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ltru-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces at ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Phillips, Addison
> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 9:31 PM
> To: Randy Presuhn; LTRU Working Group
> Subject: [Ltru] IPR mumbles..
> 
> Hi Randy,
> 
> Thanks for this.
> 
> >
> > > Since we include the 6.c.iii mumble, I have applied the
> > > noDerivatives200811 IPR directive.
> >
> > I do not think we want that, since that would hamstring attempts
> to
> > revised it in the future.
> 
> I don't think that's entirely true. The IETF Standards Process is
> explicitly excluded from the derivative works text, at least in
> 6.c.iii. At the same time, 6.c.iii has an explicit no-derivatives
> section to it. IANAL, but since 6.c.iii prohibits derivatives, I
> don't see how I can check 'trust200811'?? Can I get guidance on
> this? In the meantime, I can remove the additional no-derivatives
> text and just use 6.c.iii.
> 
> > ...
> > > I may need to move the 6.c.iii mumble into the copyright
> manually
> > before submission.
> >
> > I don't recall anyone saying exactly where the incantation needs
> > to go, but it would seem to make sense as the second paragraph
> > of the "Status of this Memo" section or as a third paragraph in
> > the copyright notice.  Treating it as ordinary text before the
> > absract might cause XML2RFC to do the right thing.
> 
> I'll try some permutations. My first attempt wasn't successful.
> 
> >
> > Scanning the diffs, two potential problems jumped out at me:
> >    - The text put in for issue #1 (which was cast as just
> >      updating a reference) creates a technical change
> >    - It looks issue #3's agreed text didn't get put in.
> >
> > PLEASE post followup on these two issues (or on any other issues)
> > in separate threads, including the issue number in the subject
> line.
> >
> 
> Any response from me will be under separate cover... I have not
> looked at these issues as of yet.
> 
> Addison
> 
> Addison Phillips
> Globalization Architect -- Lab126
> 
> Internationalization is not a feature.
> It is an architecture.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.