I inserted the text in the ticket into my editor's copy. I did include the phrase "for historical purposes". Addison Addison Phillips Globalization Architect -- Lab126 Internationalization is not a feature. It is an architecture. > -----Original Message----- > From: ltru-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces at ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Phillips, Addison > Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 9:31 PM > To: Randy Presuhn; LTRU Working Group > Subject: [Ltru] IPR mumbles.. > > Hi Randy, > > Thanks for this. > > > > > > Since we include the 6.c.iii mumble, I have applied the > > > noDerivatives200811 IPR directive. > > > > I do not think we want that, since that would hamstring attempts > to > > revised it in the future. > > I don't think that's entirely true. The IETF Standards Process is > explicitly excluded from the derivative works text, at least in > 6.c.iii. At the same time, 6.c.iii has an explicit no-derivatives > section to it. IANAL, but since 6.c.iii prohibits derivatives, I > don't see how I can check 'trust200811'?? Can I get guidance on > this? In the meantime, I can remove the additional no-derivatives > text and just use 6.c.iii. > > > ... > > > I may need to move the 6.c.iii mumble into the copyright > manually > > before submission. > > > > I don't recall anyone saying exactly where the incantation needs > > to go, but it would seem to make sense as the second paragraph > > of the "Status of this Memo" section or as a third paragraph in > > the copyright notice. Treating it as ordinary text before the > > absract might cause XML2RFC to do the right thing. > > I'll try some permutations. My first attempt wasn't successful. > > > > > Scanning the diffs, two potential problems jumped out at me: > > - The text put in for issue #1 (which was cast as just > > updating a reference) creates a technical change > > - It looks issue #3's agreed text didn't get put in. > > > > PLEASE post followup on these two issues (or on any other issues) > > in separate threads, including the issue number in the subject > line. > > > > Any response from me will be under separate cover... I have not > looked at these issues as of yet. > > Addison > > Addison Phillips > Globalization Architect -- Lab126 > > Internationalization is not a feature. > It is an architecture. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ltru mailing list > Ltru at ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.