[Ltru] Issue #29: handling 'chs'

["Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>]

Hi -

Reminder: PLEASE use a new (and appropriate) subject
line when rasing new issues, and stick to one issue per
message.  PLEASE!

> From: "Kent Karlsson" <kent.karlsson14 at comhem.se>
> To: "Doug Ewell" <doug at ewellic.org>; "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org>
> Cc: "Michael Everson" <everson at evertype.com>; <ISO639-3 at sil.org>; "Rebecca S. Guenther" <rgue at loc.gov>
> Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 4:30 AM
> Subject: Re: [Ltru] Data update from ISO 639-5 to draft-4645bis
...
> I think this holds also for "chs", Chumash, which I gather is the code
> that is referred to in "1 retirement of a code element representing a
> language family whose constituents were already present in [the] code set.
> This code element will be recommended for inclusion in ISO 639-5". See
> http://www.sil.org/iso639-3/cr_files/639-3_ChangeRequests_2008_Sum&add.pdf.
> (But at the moment chs is not covered by any part of 639, except as
> "retired"...

It's not at all clear to me what the proposal is here, but I've entered this
as issue #29.

Randy