Hi - As co-chair: There are currently SEVEN open issues on 4645bis. See the list at http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/ltru/trac/report/1 If there are other issues that require action, PLEASE report them, ONE PER MESSAGE, with an appropriate subject line. I'm not happy that all this stuff is popping up just now, particularly since for some of these it is't at all clear what the proposed resolution is. Here's a summary how I'd like to procede. If you'd like to respond to any of these, PLEASE do it in the thread for the corresponding issue!!!! #22 - if we don't see some discussion and OK on the ietf-languages at iana.org list for making the changes to the preferred value for CS, we will REVERT the changes in the I-D, which will require the LSR to make the changes after the RFC is published. It seems more sensible to to not revert the changes, but I'm willing to take that path only with the blessing of the LSR. #24: we're awaiting a concrete textual proposal. If none appears by Monday afternoon (Pacific Time) February 23, I will close it with no action to be taken by the editor. #25: If there are no objections to the editor's proposal by Monday afternoon (Pacific Time) February 23, I propose accepting this proposed resolution. #26: we're awaiting a concrete textual proposal. If none appears by Monday afternoon (Pacific Time) February 23, I will close it with no action to be taken by the editor. #27: we're awaiting a concrete textual proposal. If none appears by Monday afternoon (Pacific Time) February 23, I will close it with no action to be taken by the editor. #28: If there are no objections to the editor's proposal by Monday afternoon (Pacific Time) February 23, I propose accepting this proposed resolution. #29: we're awaiting a concrete textual proposal. If none appears by Monday afternoon (Pacific Time) February 23, I will close it with no action to be taken by the editor. Randy
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.