This is not an issue. 'car' was deleted from 639-5, but not from 639-2 nor 639-3, and is present as it should be in 4645bis draft 9. Den 2009-02-21 19.04, skrev "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>: > Hi - > >> From: "Doug Ewell" <doug at ewellic.org> >> To: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org> >> Cc: "Michael Everson" <everson at evertype.com>; <ISO639-3 at sil.org>; "Kent >> Karlsson" <kent.karlsson14 at comhem.se>; "Rebecca S. > Guenther" <rgue at loc.gov> >> Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 6:37 PM >> Subject: Re: [Ltru] Data update from ISO 639-5 to draft-4645bis > ... >> 1. 'car' for "Carib languages" has been deleted. This is consistent >> with the discussion I had with Rebecca Guenther and Joan Spanne, >> captured in the next-to-last paragraph of Section 2.3 in draft-4645bis. >> (Now that the decision is reflected in the standard, it'll be nice to >> get rid of that shady-sounding passage.) > > This has been added as issue #26. > > Randy > > > _______________________________________________ > Ltru mailing list > Ltru at ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.