[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Issue 26: deletion of 'car'



This is not an issue. 'car' was deleted from 639-5, but not from 639-2 nor
639-3, and is present as it should be in 4645bis draft 9.


Den 2009-02-21 19.04, skrev "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>:

> Hi -
> 
>> From: "Doug Ewell" <doug at ewellic.org>
>> To: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org>
>> Cc: "Michael Everson" <everson at evertype.com>; <ISO639-3 at sil.org>; "Kent
>> Karlsson" <kent.karlsson14 at comhem.se>; "Rebecca S.
> Guenther" <rgue at loc.gov>
>> Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 6:37 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Ltru] Data update from ISO 639-5 to draft-4645bis
> ...
>> 1. 'car' for "Carib languages" has been deleted.  This is consistent
>> with the discussion I had with Rebecca Guenther and Joan Spanne,
>> captured in the next-to-last paragraph of Section 2.3 in draft-4645bis.
>> (Now that the decision is reflected in the standard, it'll be nice to
>> get rid of that shady-sounding passage.)
> 
> This has been added as issue #26.
> 
> Randy
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru



Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.