[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Issue 26: deletion of 'car'

From: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>
To: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 10:53:08 -0800
References: <C5C609AF.7663%kent.karlsson14 at comhem.se>

Hi -

> From: "Kent Karlsson" <kent.karlsson14 at comhem.se>
> To: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>; "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org>
> Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 10:42 AM
> Subject: Re: [Ltru] Issue 26: deletion of 'car'
>
> This is not an issue. 'car' was deleted from 639-5, but not from 639-2 nor
> 639-3, and is present as it should be in 4645bis draft 9.

Doug was proposing changes to the  next-to-last paragraph of
Section 2.3 in draft-4645bis.  That makes it an issue.

Randy

References:
- Re: [Ltru] Issue 26: deletion of 'car'
  - From: Kent Karlsson

Prev by Date: Re: [Ltru] Issue #29: handling 'chs'
Next by Date: Re: [Ltru] Issue #27:addition of 'day'
Previous by thread: Re: [Ltru] Issue 26: deletion of 'car'
Next by thread: [Ltru] Issue #27:addition of 'day'
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.