Randy Presuhn <randy underscore presuhn at mindspring dot com> wrote:
2. 'day' for "Land Dayak languages" has been added. Since it was already in 639-2, it's already in draft-4645bis and marked as a collection. There are still two other collections, Bihari and Himachali, which are not in 639-5.... I've added this as issue 27. As a technical contribtor:I really think this is a total non-issue, and am surprised that it was even raised at this time.
I didn't raise it as an issue. I was trying to point out that I had done my job to detect and resolve any discrepancies between the old and new 639-5 data. 'day' and 'bh' and 'him' are already in the draft; we have no work to do here.
-- Doug Ewell * Thornton, Colorado, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14 http://www.ewellic.org http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages ˆ
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.