Randy Presuhn <randy underscore presuhn at mindspring dot com> wrote:
This is not an issue. 'car' was deleted from 639-5, but not from 639-2 nor 639-3, and is present as it should be in 4645bis draft 9.Doug was proposing changes to the next-to-last paragraph of Section 2.3 in draft-4645bis. That makes it an issue.
Correct. I contend that the paragraph is no longer relevant and should be deleted.
-- Doug Ewell * Thornton, Colorado, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14 http://www.ewellic.org http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages ˆ
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.