[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Issue #29: handling 'chs'

From: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>
To: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 11:17:05 -0800
References: <C5C60FF2.7682%kent.karlsson14 at comhem.se>

Hi -

> From: "Kent Karlsson" <kent.karlsson14 at comhem.se>
> To: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>; "LTRU Working > Group" <ltru at ietf.org>
> Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 11:09 AM
> Subject: Re: [Ltru] Issue #29: handling 'chs'
...
> I did not realise that every sentence had to be an issue, or would be
> interpreted as an issue for LTRU. My apologies.
...

I apologize for the harshness of my response.
My frustration must be showing.

Randy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #29: handling 'chs'
  - From: Randy Presuhn

References:
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #29: handling 'chs'
  - From: Kent Karlsson

Prev by Date: Re: [Ltru] Data update from ISO 639-5 to draft-4645bis
Next by Date: Re: [Ltru] Current open issues
Previous by thread: Re: [Ltru] Issue #29: handling 'chs'
Next by thread: Re: [Ltru] Issue #29: handling 'chs'
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.