On 2009/04/01 13:33, Mark Davis wrote:https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis/
BTW, can someone point me to the tool for viewing the last call status?
Alex, can you give us a hint about when to expect the next steps,
or tell us what you need from our side, if anything?
Regards, Martin.--
Mark
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 03:19, Martin Duerst<duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote:
Hello Chris,
[I'm assuming you are the acting AD currently.
I'm cc'ing Alex so he knows what might be comming up for him.]
I'm glad to finally request IETF LAST CALL for
draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis(-10) and draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis(-21),
the two current WG documents of the LTRU WG.
The intended status of 4645bis is informational,
the intended status of 4646bis is BCP (BCP 47 together
with RFC 4647, which stays as it is).
I'm sending the shepherding documents in separate mails,
but I'm using this mail as a trigger; that's what Ted Hardie
told me to do when I did this thing last time.
If I need to do anything else, please don't hesitate to tell me.
Regards, Martin.
#-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp
#-# Martin J.Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.