Re: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt

["Martin J. Dürst" <duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp>]

On 2009/04/09 9:23, Randy Presuhn wrote:
> Hi -
>
> > From: "Alexey Melnikov"<alexey.melnikov at isode.com>
> > To: "Randy Presuhn"<randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>
> > Cc: "Lisa Dusseault"<lisa.dusseault at messagingarchitects.com>; "LTRU Working Group"<ltru at ietf.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 5:16 PM
> > Subject: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-10.txt
> ...
> > After your explanation I think the sentence that reads "This memo is a
> > new work, not an incremental update of [RFC4645]" should be reworded or
> > removed. Otherwise it is just asking for a question: "if this is new
> > work, how come it is 4645bis"? At least it is not clear to me what the
> > WG is calling "new work".
>
> As a technical contributor...
>
> I'd prefer to simply delete the sentence.

Fine with me, too (both technically and as a co-chair).

Regards,   Martin.

--
#-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp   mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp