Re: [Ltru] Issue #37 (AD comment #4) delete last sentence of 2.2.9 note

[Mark Davis <mark at macchiato.com>]

agreed
Mark

On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 12:30, Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com> wrote:

Hi -

> From: "Alexey Melnikov" <alexey.melnikov at isode.com>
> To: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org>
> Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2009 1:08 AM
> Subject: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt
...
> 4). In Section 2.2.9:
>
> >    Note well: although the 'Language-Tag' production appearing in this
> >    document is functionally equivalent to the one in [RFC4646], it has
> >    been changed to prevent certain errors in well-formedness arising
> >    from the old 'grandfathered' production.  This version of the ABNF is
> >    RECOMMENDED as a replacement for the older version.
>
> (nit) I suggest deleting the last sentence, as it doesn't provide any
> useful information to a reader (as the WG wants
> draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt to replace RFC 4646, it is clear that
> the WG believes that the new ABNF is better). Also I don't think it uses
> RFC 2119 keyword properly.
...

As a technical contributor, I agree with deleting the sentence.
The whole paragraph arose as a result of concerns about the
perception of the stability of the grammar.

Randy

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru