[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Issue #44 (AD comment #11) informative reference to MIME

From: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>
To: "Alexey Melnikov" <alexey.melnikov at isode.com>
Cc: LTRU Working Group <ltru at ietf.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 18:00:36 -0700
References: <49E04FF4.1040804 at isode.com> <006c01c9bae2$f32c1ee0$6801a8c0 at oemcomputer> <49E0FC49.7000208 at isode.com> <30b660a20904111750qfc53f2cpb52ba7d10432b88d at mail.gmail.com>

Hi -

> From: "Mark Davis" <mark at macchiato.com>
> To: "Alexey Melnikov" <alexey.melnikov at isode.com>
> Cc: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>; "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org>
> Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2009 5:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [Ltru] Issue #44 (AD comment #11) informative reference to MIME
>
> I would rather keep examples; they are usually helpful in understanding the
> text.

I could live with adding the necessary informative reference if folks
prefer to keep the example.

Randy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #44 (AD comment #11) informative reference to MIME
  - From: "Martin J. Dürst"

References:
- [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt
  - From: Alexey Melnikov
- [Ltru] Issue #44 (AD comment #11) informative reference to MIME
  - From: Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #44 (AD comment #11) informative reference to MIME
  - From: Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Ltru] Issue #44 (AD comment #11) informative reference to MIME
  - From: Mark Davis

Prev by Date: Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST
Next by Date: Re: [Ltru] Issue #45 (AD comment #12) SHOULD in section 4.5 on preferred value mappings
Previous by thread: Re: [Ltru] Issue #44 (AD comment #11) informative reference to MIME
Next by thread: Re: [Ltru] Issue #44 (AD comment #11) informative reference to MIME
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.