[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Issue #41 (AD comment #8) section 3.5 SHOULD vs MUST



Mark Davis wrote:

I think it should be a MUST. A SHOULD implies that you don't need to do it if there are good / reasonable reasons not to. That isn't the case here; the requirements are clear.

That doesn't prevent us from taking the request and making fixes to format, spelling, etc before approving.

I think it comes down to how much deviation is acceptable. RFC 4646bis is a long document with some rather arcane rules, and it is likely that some very sensible subtag requests will come along that


Mark



On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 14:08, Doug Ewell <doug at ewellic.org> wrote:

Alexey Melnikov <alexey dot melnikov at isode dot com> wrote:


The fields in the "Record Requested" section SHOULD follow the requirements in Section 3.1.


What are the reasons not to follow requirements in Section 3.1? (I.e. why is SHOULD used instead of MUST?)



I think the idea was to allow the language subtag reviewer to consider requests that followed the spirit, if not the letter of the syntax. Since the LSR is not an automated process, and we do not want to introduce artificial barriers to those needing language subtags, a little flexibility is desirable. Consequently, I think the SHOULD is ok - it's operational advice, and failure to follow it to the letter won't necessarily cause any problems at all.


I understand and agree with the desire to be flexible.
However my understanding is that the request sent to IANA must be in the correct form. Maybe you should clarify that.


My understanding is that people submitting requests to ietf-languages are encouraged, but not required, to follow the requirements in Section 3.1, and the Reviewer and clerical assistant (with the help of ietf-languages contributors) are expected to fix any editorial problems before approving a submission and sending it to IANA.

--
Doug Ewell  *  Thornton, Colorado, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://www.ewellic.org
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages  ˆ




_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.