Re: [Ltru] Issue #34 (AD comment #1) - who scrutinizes primary subtags refected by ISO 639/RA-JAC?

["Martin J. Dürst" <duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp>]

In my impression, this was not specifically the Language Subtag 
Reviewer, but the overall review process. But of course the Language 
Subtag Reviewer is a very important part of that process, and the 
ultimate arbiter. So I guess the proposed text should be fine. We don't 
have a (sub)section for the review process as such to point to.

Regards,    Martin.


On 2009/04/12 4:17, Randy Presuhn wrote:
> Hi -
>
> > From: "Alexey Melnikov"<alexey.melnikov at isode.com>
> > To: "LTRU Working Group"<ltru at ietf.org>
> > Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2009 1:08 AM
> > Subject: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt
> ...
> > 1).
> >
> > > 2.2.1.  Primary Language Subtag
> >    [...]
> >
> > >     5.  Any language subtags of 5 to 8 characters in length in the IANA
> >    [...]
> >
> > >         At the time this document was created, there were no examples of
> > >         this kind of subtag and future registrations of this type are
> > >         discouraged: primary languages are strongly RECOMMENDED for
> > >         registration with ISO 639, and proposals rejected by ISO 639/
> > >         RA-JAC will be closely scrutinized before they are registered
> > >         with IANA.
> > [Unclear text] Scrutinized by whom? At this point in the document it is
> > not clear who is going to perform the action.
> > I think you meant that this would be done by the designated registry
> > reviewer, so I suggest adding a forward reference here.
> ...
>
> Ok with me.  Proposed text:
> replace "scrutinized" with "scrutinized by the Language Subtag Reviewer
> (see 3.2)"
>
> Randy
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

--
#-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp   mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp