Don't know if I should inject my two cents here; I agree with Mark that "SHOULD NOT" should
become a "MUST NOT"
As for the other "SHOULD"s/"MUST"s (section 3.5, 4.5) I don't know enough to comment.
Best,
C. E. Whitehead
cewcathar at hotmail.com
>> From: "Alexey Melnikov" <alexey.melnikov at isode.com>
>> To: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org>
>> Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2009 1:08 AM
>> Subject: [Ltru] AD review of draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21bis.txt
>> 3). Section 2.2.4 says:
>>
>> > F. All other UN numeric codes for countries or areas that do not
>> > have an associated ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 code MUST NOT be
>> > entered into the registry and MUST NOT be used to form
>> > language tags. For more information about these codes, see
>> > Section 3.4.
>>
>> And Section 3.4 says:
>>
>> > 16. UN M.49 has codes for both countries and areas (such as '276'
>> > for Germany) and geographical regions and sub-regions (such as
>> > '150' for Europe). UN M.49 country or area codes for which
>> > there is no corresponding ISO 3166-1 code SHOULD NOT be
>>
>> Unless I am confused, I think this SHOULD NOT contradicts MUST NOT in
>> section 2.2.4.
> I think you need to change one of 2 sections.
|