Well, we're not done yet. Write a rule in 4645bis to cover these so that there is no silly work to do by the LSR. It should be pretty straight forward: --- Registrations completed under RFC 4646 after this document was frozen but before the registry was updated MUST be incorporated by IANA in the order in which they were received (as determined by their File-Date record) into the new registry as part of the update process. Registrations after date yyyy-mm-dd are the ones to be scrutinized by IANA. --- Addison Addison Phillips Globalization Architect -- Lab126 Internationalization is not a feature. It is an architecture. > -----Original Message----- > From: ltru-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces at ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Doug Ewell > Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 8:41 PM > To: LTRU Working Group > Subject: Re: [Ltru] Fw: [IANA #235907] Last Call: draft-ietf-ltru- > 4646bis (Tags for Identifying Languages) to BCP > > John Cowan <cowan at ccil dot org> wrote: > > >>> 1] What should be done with the existing registry of templates > at > >>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/lang-subtags- > templates/index.html? > > > > Nothing. It will grow as new subtags are registered. > > There might be one issue related to this, though. While the LTRU > process drags on, the continuing efforts of standards bodies and > individual requesters on ietf-languages may result in new and/or > changed > subtags in the existing Registry that don't appear in draft-4645bis. > This has already happened as a result of the latest batch of ISO > 15924 > script codes, including 'Zinh' and five others. > > According to the co-chairs, we can't just "AUTH48" these into the > new > Registry; they need to be re-added, exceptionally, by ietf- > languages and > the Reviewer. In the case of changes mandated by changes to core > standards, the outcome will probably be the same, but in the case > of > individually requested variants, this could potentially result in > the > same debate being held twice, possibly with different results. > > Given all this, I don't know whether the registration forms for > such > re-registered subtags might need to be posted on the IANA site a > second > time. > > -- > Doug Ewell * Thornton, Colorado, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14 > http://www.ewellic.org > http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html > http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages ˆ > > > _______________________________________________ > Ltru mailing list > Ltru at ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.