Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available

["Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>]

Hi -

> From: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp>
> To: "Mark Davis" <mark at macchiato.com>; "Alexey Melnikov" <alexey.melnikov at isode.com>
> Cc: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>; "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org>
> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 4:07 AM
> Subject: Re: [Ltru] Ticket #45: updated editor's copy available
...
> [shepherd hat on]
>
> It appears that this is the last full version of the proposed text.
> Mark nodded at
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru/current/msg12589.html
> to a small fix from Kent at
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru/current/msg12588.html
>
> Is that a correct summary of the current state? There is some
> back-and-forth between Mark and CE Whitehead after that, but it's not
> clear what the result of that is.

I *think* so.  I'd *REALLY* like to see a post of whatever the current
proposed text is.

> When searching through
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-21, I found the word
> "canonical" all over the place. I would suggest that some people do a
> careful read of these places, checking whether they fit together with
> the new text. In particular, if there is text elsewhere in the document
> that assumes that canonicalization may be without or with extlangs, then
> we would have to revise the text proposal below.

A big THANK YOU to Kent for his post on that topic!

Randy