Re: [Ltru] draft-22 submitted...

["Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>]

Hi -

> From: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp>
> To: "Phillips, Addison" <addison at amazon.com>
> Cc: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 6:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [Ltru] draft-22 submitted...
...
> [As a technical contributor] I note one issue:
>
> "which is thus the canonical form in Java." should be
> "which is thus the preferred form in Java."
>
> I am fine with the current version of section 4.5 in -22.
>
> [as a co-chair] There hasn't been consensus declared on the issue above,
> but I count three people agreeing to the change, and nobody against it,
> so it seems pretty clear how consensus will go unless we hear from
> people who are against the change.
>
> (Randy, I leave it to you whether you want to make that a separate issue
> or whether to lump it with issue #45.)

Let's lump it in with #45.  (Though I recall long ago arguing for the
deletion of the example altogether, I don't want to re-open that discussion.)

Randy