Hi - > From: "Alexey Melnikov" <alexey.melnikov at isode.com> > To: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org> > Cc: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp>; "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com> > Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 5:23 AM > Subject: Additional issues with 4646bis raised by an Apps Review Team review ... > 1). In Section 3.5: > > > The ietf-languages list is an open list and can be joined by sending > > a request to <ietf-languages-request at iana.org>. The list can be > > hosted by IANA or by any third party at the request of IESG. > > It is not clear how the "third party" option would interact with IANA > managing the registry. > The lists either have to be managed by IANA on an IANA system or have to > be routed through IANA systems. > If there is a desire to be able to delegate handling of this mailing > list to a third party, then perhaps > the mailing list should be in a separate subdomain, e.g. > ietf-languages at languages.iana.org. > I think this needs to be discussed further with IANA. ... As co-chair: I've entered this into the tracker as ltru issue #48. For sanity's sake, PLEASE include the issue number in your postings on this topic, and PLEASE do not comment on multiple issues in a single message. Mixing issues in a thread only slows things down. Randy
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.